Comments on: Galatians 1:17

By: mel winstead

mel winstead — Tue, 24 Nov 2009 02:04:08 +0000

I had to do a double-take on the comment by the lawyer. Jesus and Paul’s teachings are opposing truth claims? Jesus taught that man must believe in Him (Jesus) and his word. Paul taught that man must believe on Jesus and his word. The only ways to get around the two unified teachings is to accept that the New Testament contradicts itself. If one wishes to assert that, he/she has an uphill battle, for unity is seen throughout – namely in the simple teaching I just mentioned. Secondly, as Paul is vehement in defending in Galatians one, he received the revelation from God. Now the lawyer has another problem (it’s uphill as I said): God has contradicted Jesus. I think I’ll take Jesus and Paul over the lawyer.

By: John Ben Regesh, J.D.

John Ben Regesh, J.D. — Mon, 16 Nov 2009 05:41:13 +0000

You would do better to ignore Paul and move back to Jesus’s teachings. A book of mine was just published wherein I laid out Paul’s teachings in context like a good lawyer would a deposition. I then laid out the teachings of Jesus Christ. Paul’s teachings are the opposite of Jesus’s teachings. Further if you read his epistles and compare them to his exploits in Acts you will find the motives for his actions. You can find the book on all the major sites like Barnes and Noble and Amazon. Look under my name John Ben Regesh and it is easier to find. The name of the Book: “Saint Paul, The First Antichrist / Deception and Dogma”. Antichrist is defined as that given by John in his epistles, not Nostradamus.